Fujifilm |
X-Pro3 |
---|---|
Announced: | 23 Oct 2019 |
Sensor Resolution: | 26Mp |
Sensor Type: | APS-C BSI-CMOS |
ISO: | 160-12800 |
Weight: | 497g |
Physical Dimensions: | 141 x 83 x 46 mm |
Viewfinder: | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) |
Screen Type: | 3" Tilting |
Video Resolutions: | 4096x2160 |
Sigma |
fp |
---|---|
Announced: | 11 Jul 2019 |
Sensor Resolution: | 25Mp |
Sensor Type: | Full frame BSI-CMOS |
ISO: | 100-25600 |
Weight: | 422g |
Physical Dimensions: | 113 x 70 x 45 mm |
Viewfinder: | None |
Screen Type: | 3.2" Fixed |
Video Resolutions: | 3840x2160 |
![]() Portrait |
![]() |
Sigma fp L |
69 | $2,499.00 |
![]() Landscape |
![]() |
Nikon D780 |
69 | $1,554.00 |
![]() Sport |
![]() |
Olympus OM System OM-1 |
76 | buy on |
![]() Street |
![]() |
Sony Alpha A7c |
75 | buy on |
![]() Everyday |
![]() |
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VII |
77 | $1,204.95 |
Fujifilm |
X-Pro3 |
---|---|
Announced: | 23 Oct 2019 |
Sensor Resolution: | 26Mp |
Sensor Type: | APS-C BSI-CMOS |
ISO: | 160-12800 |
Weight: | 497g |
Physical Dimensions: | 141 x 83 x 46 mm |
Viewfinder: | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) |
Screen Type: | 3" Tilting |
Video Resolutions: | 4096x2160 |
Review | compare Fujifilm X-Pro3 with | overall score | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
FujifilmX-Pro3 | 65 | 53 | 50 | 63 | 77 | 78 | $2,158.00 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
CanonEOS R5 | 73 | 69 | 69 | 73 | 70 | 72 | $3,099.99 |
![]() |
SonyAlpha A7c | 72 | 65 | 66 | 70 | 75 | 76 | $1,759.95 |
![]() |
SonyAlpha A7 III | 72 | 66 | 66 | 72 | 73 | 74 | $1,739.95 |
![]() |
NikonZ7 Mark II | 70 | 69 | 69 | 68 | 70 | 71 | buy on |
![]() |
Sigmafp L | 67 | 69 | 69 | 58 | 67 | 69 | $2,499.00 |
![]() |
SonyAlpha a6600 | 65 | 51 | 50 | 68 | 72 | 74 | $1,291.99 |
Sigma |
fp |
---|---|
Announced: | 11 Jul 2019 |
Sensor Resolution: | 25Mp |
Sensor Type: | Full frame BSI-CMOS |
ISO: | 100-25600 |
Weight: | 422g |
Physical Dimensions: | 113 x 70 x 45 mm |
Viewfinder: | None |
Screen Type: | 3.2" Fixed |
Video Resolutions: | 3840x2160 |
Review | compare Sigma fp with | overall score | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Sigmafp | 67 | 64 | 63 | 57 | 73 | 74 | $1,599.00 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
CanonEOS R5 | 73 | 69 | 69 | 73 | 70 | 72 | $3,099.99 |
![]() |
SonyAlpha A7c | 72 | 65 | 66 | 70 | 75 | 76 | $1,759.95 |
![]() |
NikonZ7 Mark II | 70 | 69 | 69 | 68 | 70 | 71 | buy on |
![]() |
Sigmafp L | 67 | 69 | 69 | 58 | 67 | 69 | $2,499.00 |
![]() |
OlympusOM System OM-1 | 67 | 48 | 46 | 76 | 74 | 77 | buy on |
![]() |
FujifilmX-Pro3 | 65 | 53 | 50 | 63 | 77 | 78 | $2,158.00 |
In case you are wondering which of these cameras you should buy, then this is the right place to find an answer. Here you will find listed all the main differences among Fujifilm X-Pro3 and Sigma fp, calculated by the CameraRace iCamRank algorithm.
But, as you may know, the technical performance is meaningless if applied to the wrong context. This is the reason why the iCamRank "weights" differently the camera technical features for each type of photography. Thus, below you'll find our suggestions, based on your preferred photography genre:
Sigma fp is better for portrait or landscape photography; Fujifilm X-Pro3 is instead your choice if you shoot sport or street photography or for everyday use.
Need further details? Below you will find a full comparison of all the technical specifications.