Leica Q3 43 Vs Canon EOS R5 Mark II: complete comparison

Leica
Q3 43 change

Vs

Canon
EOS R5 Mark II change
Leica Q3 43 medal landscape

Canon EOS R5 Mark II trophy medal portrait medal sport medal street medal everyday
79

Overall Score

84

Leica

Q3 43
Announced: 26 Sep 2024
Sensor Resolution: 60Mp
Sensor Type: Full frame BSI-CMOS
ISO: 50-100000
Weight: 794g
Physical Dimensions: 130 x 80 x 98 mm
Viewfinder: Electronic
Screen Type: 3" Tilting
Video Resolutions: 8192x4320
73
Image Quality
70
91
Speed Performance
100
93
Versatility
100
65
Comfort
78

Canon

EOS R5 Mark II
Announced: 17 Jul 2024
Sensor Resolution: 45Mp
Sensor Type: Full frame Stacked CMOS
ISO: 100-51200
Weight: 746g
Physical Dimensions: 138 x 101 x 93 mm
Viewfinder: Electronic
Screen Type: 3.2" Fully articulated
Video Resolutions: 8192x4320
Disclaimer

This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

The best camera for different types of photography

Leica
Q3 43

vs

Canon
EOS R5 Mark II

71
Portrait Portrait Portrait
71
73
Landscape Landscape Landscape
71
85
SportSport Sport
88
77
Street Street Street
85
79
Everyday Everyday Everyday
87

Leica Q3 43
pros and cons

Leica Q3 43

Leica

Q3 43
Announced: 26 Sep 2024
Sensor Resolution: 60Mp
Sensor Type: Full frame BSI-CMOS
ISO: 50-100000
Weight: 794g
Physical Dimensions: 130 x 80 x 98 mm
Viewfinder: Electronic
Screen Type: 3" Tilting
Video Resolutions: 8192x4320

prospros

  • This camera autofocus is able to follow moving subjects
  • The Leica Q3 43 is tropicalized - this means you can use it also in adverse atmospheric and environmental conditions without ruining it
  • The integrated stabilizer allows you to shoot firmly even in low light conditions
  • The LCD display is a convenient and almost indispensable feature
  • High resolution in video recording
  • Thanks to the wireless connection, Leica Q3 43 allows immediate picture sharing

conscons

  • Warning - Leica Q3 43 battery has only 350.0 shoots autonomy. This might be a limiting factor if you think you'll have to do long photo sessions without having the chance to recharge it.

Leica Q3 43 and its rivals

Review compare Leica Q3 43 with overall score Portrait
Portrait		 Landscape
Landscape		 Sport
Sport		 Street
Street		 Everyday
Everyday
LeicaQ3 43 Leica
Q3 43		 79 71 73 85 77 79

Canon EOS R5 Mark II
pros and cons

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Canon

EOS R5 Mark II
Announced: 17 Jul 2024
Sensor Resolution: 45Mp
Sensor Type: Full frame Stacked CMOS
ISO: 100-51200
Weight: 746g
Physical Dimensions: 138 x 101 x 93 mm
Viewfinder: Electronic
Screen Type: 3.2" Fully articulated
Video Resolutions: 8192x4320

pros pros

  • This camera autofocus is able to follow moving subjects
  • The Canon EOS R5 Mark II is tropicalized - this means you can use it also in adverse atmospheric and environmental conditions without ruining it
  • The integrated stabilizer allows you to shoot firmly even in low light conditions
  • The LCD display is a convenient and almost indispensable feature
  • High resolution in video recording
  • The microphone input can be very useful if you shoot videos
  • Precise and fast autofocus, ideal for action photos, it performs well even in low light conditions
  • The fully articulated display allows you to manage the framing even in hard conditions
  • The second memory slot makes the camera more reliable, also for professional use
  • Thanks to the wireless connection, Canon EOS R5 Mark II allows immediate picture sharing

Canon EOS R5 Mark II and its rivals

Review compare Canon EOS R5 Mark II with overall score Portrait
Portrait		 Landscape
Landscape		 Sport
Sport		 Street
Street		 Everyday
Everyday
CanonEOS R5 Mark II Canon
EOS R5 Mark II		 84 71 71 88 85 87

Leica Q3 43 vs Canon EOS R5 Mark II, which is better?

In case you are wondering which of these cameras you should buy, then this is the right place to find an answer. Here you will find listed all the main differences among Leica Q3 43 and Canon EOS R5 Mark II, calculated by the CameraRace iCamRank algorithm.

  • Technically speaking, Canon EOS R5 Mark II is superior to Leica Q3 43, with an overall iCamRank score of 84 and 79, respectively.
  • The image quality of Leica Q3 43 (73) is similar to that of Canon EOS R5 Mark II (70).
  • Canon EOS R5 Mark II (100) performs better than Leica Q3 43 (91) in terms of speed.
  • Canon EOS R5 Mark II is more versatile than Leica Q3 43 (100 a 93).
  • The handling of Canon EOS R5 Mark II (78) is more effective than that of Leica Q3 43 (65).

But, as you may know, the technical performance is meaningless if applied to the wrong context. This is the reason why the iCamRank "weights" differently the camera technical features for each type of photography. Thus, below you'll find our suggestions, based on your preferred photography genre:

Leica Q3 43 is better for landscape photography; Canon EOS R5 Mark II is instead your choice if you shoot sport or street photography or for everyday use.

Need further details? Below you will find a full comparison of all the technical specifications.

Leica
Q3 43

Sensor
comparison

Canon
EOS R5 Mark II

BSI-CMOS

Sensor Type

Stacked CMOS

Full frame

Sensor Size

Full frame

36.0 x 24.0 mm

Sensor Dimensions

36.0 x 24.0 mm

864.0 mm2

Sensor Area

864.0 mm2

60 Mp up

Sensor Resolution

down 45 Mp

9520 x 6336 up

Max Image Resolution

down 8192 x 5464

100000 up

Max Native ISO

down 51200

50 up

Min Native ISO

down 100

yes

RAW Support

yes

Leica
Q3 43

Lens
comparison

Canon
EOS R5 Mark II

fixed lens

Lens Mount

Canon RF

yes

Manual Focus

yes

43 mm (1x)

Lens Focal Range

-

F2.0

Max Aperture

-

17cm

Macro Focus Range

-

-

Number of Lenses

72

-

Focal Length Multiplier

1.0

Leica
Q3 43

Screen Type
comparison

Canon
EOS R5 Mark II

Tilting down

Screen Type

up Fully articulated

3.0"

Screen Size

3.2"

1843Kdot down

Screen Resolution

up 2100Kdot

yes

Live View

yes

yes

Touch Screen

yes

Leica
Q3 43

Viewfinder
comparison

Canon
EOS R5 Mark II

Electronic

Viewfinder

Electronic

5760000.0

Viewfinder Resolution

5760000.0

100

Viewfinder Coverage

100

0.76x

Viewfinder Magnification

0.76x

Leica
Q3 43

Features
comparison

Canon
EOS R5 Mark II

120s

Min Shutter Speed

30s

-

Max Shutter Speed

-

fps

Continuous Shooting

fps

yes

Shutter Priority

yes

yes

Aperture Priority

yes

yes

Manual Exposure Mode

yes

yes

Exposure Compensation

yes

yes

Custom White Balance

yes

yes

Image Stabilization

yes

no

Built-in Flash

no

None

Flash Range

None

1/500s

Max Flash Sync

-

no built-in flash

Flash Modes

no built-in flash

yes

External Flash

yes

yes

AE Bracketing

yes

no

WB Bracketing

yes

Leica
Q3 43

Exposure Modes
comparison

Canon
EOS R5 Mark II

yes

Multi-Segment

yes

yes

Average

yes

yes

Spot

yes

no

Partial

yes

no

AF-Area

no

yes

Center Weighted

yes

Leica
Q3 43

Dxo Sensor Scores
comparison

Canon
EOS R5 Mark II

dato non disponibile

DxO Overall Score

dato non disponibile

dato non disponibile

DxO Color Depth

dato non disponibile

dato non disponibile

DxO Dynamic Range

dato non disponibile

dato non disponibile

DxO Low Light ISO

dato non disponibile

Leica
Q3 43

Autofocus
comparison

Canon
EOS R5 Mark II

yes

AF Touch

yes

yes

AF Continuous

yes

yes

AF Single

yes

yes

AF Tracking

yes

yes

AF Selective

yes

yes

AF Center

yes

yes

AF MultiArea

yes

yes

AF Live View

yes

yes

AF Face Detection

yes

yes

AF Contrast Detection

yes

yes

AF Phase Detection

yes

315 down

Number of Focus Points

up 5940

Number of Cross Focus Points

Leica
Q3 43

Video Features
comparison

Canon
EOS R5 Mark II

C8K/8K at 30p/25/24p C4K/4K at 60/50/30/24p 1080p at 120/100/60/50/30/24p

Video Resolutions

8192x4320 (30p/​24/​23.98p) 7680x4320 (30p/​23.98p) |4096x2160 (120p/​60p/​30p/​24p/​23.98p) |3840x2160 (120p/​60p/​30p/​23.98p) |1920x1080 (60p/​30p/​23.98p)

8192x4320

Max Video Resolution

8192x4320

MPEG-4 H.264 H.265

Video Formats

MPEG-4 H.264 H.265

no

Microphone Port

yes

no

Headphone Port

yes

Leica
Q3 43

Connectivity
comparison

Canon
EOS R5 Mark II

Built-in

Wireless Connectivity

Built-in

yes

HDMI

yes

USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec)

USB

USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec)

Leica
Q3 43

Physical
comparison

Canon
EOS R5 Mark II

yes

Environmental Sealing

yes

no

Water Proof

no

no

Dust Proof

no

no

Shock Proof

no

no

Crush Proof

no

no

Freeze Proof

no

794g

Weight

746g

130 x 80 x 98 mm

Physical Dimensions

138 x 101 x 93 mm

350 down

Battery Life

up 620

Battery Pack

Battery Type

Battery Pack

BP-SCL6

Battery Model

LP-E6P

Leica
Q3 43

Other Features
comparison

Canon
EOS R5 Mark II

Yes (2 or 12 secs)

Self Timer

Yes

yes

Timelapse Recording

yes

no

GPS

no

SD SDHC SDXC

Storage Type

CFexpress and SD (UHS-II) slots

1down

Storage Slots

up2

Copyright 2026

EMA s.r.l.s. | p.i. 11740890014

Privacy policy

Contact

Amazon Disclosure

All rights reserved

Powered by