Leica M Typ 262 Vs Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III: complete comparison

Leica M Typ 262 medal portrait medal landscape

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III trophy medal sport medal street medal everyday
45

Overall Score

64

Leica

M Typ 262

Announced: 19 Nov 2015
Sensor Resolution: 24Mp
Sensor Type: Full frame CMOS
ISO: 200-6400
Weight: 600g
Physical Dimensions: 139 x 80 x 42 mm
Viewfinder: Optical (rangefinder)
Screen Type: 3" Fixed
Video Resolutions: -
66
Image Quality
43
14
Speed Performance
78
10
Versatility
88
71
Comfort
69

Olympus

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Announced: 11 Feb 2020
Sensor Resolution: 20Mp
Sensor Type: 4/3 CMOS
ISO: 200-25600
Weight: 580g
Physical Dimensions: 134 x 91 x 69 mm
Viewfinder: Electronic
Screen Type: 3" Fully articulated
Video Resolutions: 4096x2160
Disclaimer

This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

The best camera for different types of photography

Leica
M Typ 262

vs

Olympus
OM-D E-M1 Mark III

55
Portrait Portrait Portrait
47
55
Landscape Landscape Landscape
45
33
SportSport Sport
70
49
Street Street Street
71
43
Everyday Everyday Everyday
74

Best alternative for types of photography

Leica M Typ 262
pros and cons

Leica M Typ 262

Leica

M Typ 262

Announced: 19 Nov 2015
Sensor Resolution: 24Mp
Sensor Type: Full frame CMOS
ISO: 200-6400
Weight: 600g
Physical Dimensions: 139 x 80 x 42 mm
Viewfinder: Optical (rangefinder)
Screen Type: 3" Fixed
Video Resolutions: -

prospros

  • It has fast shutter speed, ideal for action photos
  • Leica M Typ 262 is one of the smallest cameras in its category. This makes it very easy to handle and suitable for street photography and daily use

conscons

  • Warning - Leica M Typ 262 is not a tropicalized camera. If you use it in adverse conditions, you could ruin it.
  • Like it or not, we are too used to LCD display to do without it
  • Unfortunately, Leica M Typ 262 does not support wireless connection

Leica M Typ 262 and its rivals

Review compare Leica M Typ 262 with overall score Portrait
Portrait
Landscape
Landscape
Sport
Sport
Street
Street
Everyday
Everyday
LeicaM Typ 262 Leica
M Typ 262
45 55 55 33 49 43 buy on
SonyAlpha a1 Sony
Alpha a1
75 70 70 75 74 76 buy on
SonyAlpha A9 II Sony
Alpha A9 II
73 67 67 74 74 76 buy on
SonyAlpha A7c Sony
Alpha A7c
72 65 66 69 75 76 buy on
SonyAlpha A7 IV Sony
Alpha A7 IV
70 67 67 70 71 72 buy on
SonyAlpha a6100 Sony
Alpha a6100
63 51 48 62 69 72 buy on
PanasonicLumix DC-GH6 Panasonic
Lumix DC-GH6
62 47 46 70 64 67 buy on

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
pros and cons

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Olympus

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Announced: 11 Feb 2020
Sensor Resolution: 20Mp
Sensor Type: 4/3 CMOS
ISO: 200-25600
Weight: 580g
Physical Dimensions: 134 x 91 x 69 mm
Viewfinder: Electronic
Screen Type: 3" Fully articulated
Video Resolutions: 4096x2160

pros pros

  • This camera autofocus is able to follow moving subjects
  • The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III is tropicalized - this means you can use it also in adverse atmospheric and environmental conditions without ruining it
  • The integrated stabilizer allows you to shoot firmly even in low light conditions
  • The LCD display is a convenient and almost indispensable feature
  • The microphone input can be very useful if you shoot videos
  • Thanks to burst mode, it's ideal for action photos
  • It has fast shutter speed, ideal for action photos
  • The fully articulated display allows you to manage the framing even in hard conditions
  • The second memory slot makes the camera more reliable, also for professional use
  • Thanks to the wireless connection, Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III allows immediate picture sharing

conscons

  • Warning - Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III battery has only 420.0 shoots autonomy. This might be a limiting factor if you think you'll have to do long photo sessions without having the chance to recharge it.

Amazon best deals on Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and its rivals

Review compare Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III with overall score Portrait
Portrait
Landscape
Landscape
Sport
Sport
Street
Street
Everyday
Everyday
OlympusOM-D E-M1 Mark III Olympus
OM-D E-M1 Mark III
64 47 45 70 71 74 £936.00
SonyAlpha a1 Sony
Alpha a1
75 70 70 75 74 76 buy on
SonyAlpha A9 II Sony
Alpha A9 II
73 67 67 74 74 76 buy on
SonyAlpha A7c Sony
Alpha A7c
72 65 66 69 75 76 buy on
SonyAlpha A7 IV Sony
Alpha A7 IV
70 67 67 70 71 72 buy on
SonyAlpha a6600 Sony
Alpha a6600
65 51 50 67 72 74 buy on
PanasonicLumix DC-GH6 Panasonic
Lumix DC-GH6
62 47 46 70 64 67 buy on

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III, which is better?

In case you are wondering which of these cameras you should buy, then this is the right place to find an answer. Here you will find listed all the main differences among Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III, calculated by the CameraRace iCamRank algorithm.

  • Technically speaking, Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III is superior to Leica M Typ 262, with an overall iCamRank score of 64 and 45, respectively.
  • The image quality of Leica M Typ 262 (66) is superior to that of Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III (43).
  • Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III (78) performs better than Leica M Typ 262 (14) in terms of speed.
  • Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III is more versatile than Leica M Typ 262 (88 a 10).
  • Leica M Typ 262 (71) and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III (69) provide a similar handling experience.

But, as you may know, the technical performance is meaningless if applied to the wrong context. This is the reason why the iCamRank "weights" differently the camera technical features for each type of photography. Thus, below you'll find our suggestions, based on your preferred photography genre:

Leica M Typ 262 is better for portrait or landscape photography; Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III is instead your choice if you shoot sport or street photography or for everyday use.

Need further details? Below you will find a full comparison of all the technical specifications.

Leica
M Typ 262

Sensor
comparison

Olympus
OM-D E-M1 Mark III

CMOS

Sensor Type

CMOS

Full frame up

Sensor Size

down 4/3

35.8 x 23.9 mm up

Sensor Dimensions

down 17.4 x 13.0 mm

855.62 mm2 up

Sensor Area

down 226.2 mm2

24 Mp up

Sensor Resolution

down 20 Mp

5952 x 3976 up

Max Image Resolution

down 5184 x 3888

6400 down

Max Native ISO

up 25600

200

Min Native ISO

200

yes

RAW Support

yes

Leica
M Typ 262

Lens
comparison

Olympus
OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Leica M

Lens Mount

Micro Four Thirds

57 down

Number of Lenses

up 103

1

Focal Length Multiplier

2

Leica
M Typ 262

Screen Type
comparison

Olympus
OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Fixed down

Screen Type

up Fully articulated

3.0"

Screen Size

3.0"

921Kdot down

Screen Resolution

up 1037Kdot

no

Live View

yes

no

Touch Screen

yes

Leica
M Typ 262

Viewfinder
comparison

Olympus
OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Optical (rangefinder)

Viewfinder

Electronic

None

Viewfinder Resolution

2360000.0

Viewfinder Coverage

100

0.68

Viewfinder Magnification

0.74

Leica
M Typ 262

Features
comparison

Olympus
OM-D E-M1 Mark III

60s

Min Shutter Speed

60s

1/4000s

Max Shutter Speed

1/8000s

3fps down

Continuous Shooting

up 60fps

no

Shutter Priority

yes

yes

Aperture Priority

yes

yes

Manual Exposure Mode

yes

yes

Exposure Compensation

yes

yes

Custom White Balance

yes

no

Image Stabilization

yes

no

Built-in Flash

no

None

Flash Range

None

-

Max Flash Sync

1/250s

no built-in flash

Flash Modes

Redeye
Fill-in
Flash Off
Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain)
Slow sync.(1st curtain)
Slow sync.(2nd curtain)
Manual

yes

External Flash

yes

yes

AE Bracketing

yes

no

WB Bracketing

yes

Leica
M Typ 262

Exposure Modes
comparison

Olympus
OM-D E-M1 Mark III

no

Multi-Segment

yes

no

Average

yes

no

Spot

yes

no

Partial

no

no

AF-Area

no

no

Center Weighted

no

Leica
M Typ 262

Dxo Sensor Scores
comparison

Olympus
OM-D E-M1 Mark III

dato non disponibile

DxO Overall Score

dato non disponibile

dato non disponibile

DxO Color Depth

dato non disponibile

dato non disponibile

DxO Dynamic Range

dato non disponibile

dato non disponibile

DxO Low Light ISO

dato non disponibile

Leica
M Typ 262

Autofocus
comparison

Olympus
OM-D E-M1 Mark III

no

AF Touch

yes

no

AF Continuous

yes

no

AF Single

yes

no

AF Tracking

yes

no

AF Selective

yes

no

AF Center

yes

no

AF MultiArea

yes

no

AF Live View

yes

no

AF Face Detection

yes

no

AF Contrast Detection

yes

no

AF Phase Detection

yes

0 down

Number of Focus Points

up 121

0 down

Number of Cross Focus Points

up 121

Leica
M Typ 262

Video Features
comparison

Olympus
OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Video Resolutions

4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps MOV H.264 Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps MOV H.264 Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps MOV H.264 Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps MOV H.264 Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p MOV H.264 Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p MOV H.264 Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p MOV H.264 Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p MOV H.264 Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p MOV H.264 Linear PCM

-

Max Video Resolution

4096x2160

Video Formats

MPEG-4 H.264

no

Microphone Port

yes

no

Headphone Port

yes

Leica
M Typ 262

Connectivity
comparison

Olympus
OM-D E-M1 Mark III

None

Wireless Connectivity

Built-in

no

HDMI

yes

USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)

USB

USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec)

Leica
M Typ 262

Physical
comparison

Olympus
OM-D E-M1 Mark III

no

Environmental Sealing

yes

no

Water Proof

no

no

Dust Proof

no

no

Shock Proof

no

no

Crush Proof

no

no

Freeze Proof

no

600g

Weight

580g

139 x 80 x 42 mm

Physical Dimensions

134 x 91 x 69 mm

Battery Life

420

Battery Type

Battery Pack

BP-SCL2

Battery Model

BLH-1

Leica
M Typ 262

Other Features
comparison

Olympus
OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Yes (2 or 12 sec)

Self Timer

Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)

no

Timelapse Recording

yes

yes

GPS

no

SD SDHC SDXC

Storage Type

Dual SD SDHC SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot)

1down

Storage Slots

up2

Copyright 2024

EMA s.r.l.s. | p.i. 11740890014

All rights reserved

Powered by