Canon EOS 2000D

Canon EOS 2000D: full review

Thought to soon replace the glorious  1300D, Canon EOS 2000D was launched together with the cheaper model 4000D for a target of classic entry level photographers. The essential innovation of 2000D is the 24.1 megapixel CMOS APS-C sensor, already present in more advanced models, like Canon 200D and 800D. However, in this review on Canon EOS 2000D I’ll try to go beyond such substantial innovation to reveal you all its main strengths and weaknesses.

The design of Canon EOS 2000D

The first impression I got holding Canon EOS 2000D was of a rather small camera. At the same time I thought: for a camera priced less than 400 euros (the body only), the structure is solid and the grip is decent.

Of course, it goes without saying, to the touch it has that annoying plasticky feeling, typical of the cheapest models.

Focusing on details, Canon EOS 2000D has these characteristics:

Weight: 475 g (battery and memory card included)

Size: (length, height, depth): 129 x 101.3 x 77.6 mm

Thus, Canon EOS 200D is a pocket camera with a contained weight, but it certainly isn’t a feather (unless you’re comparing it with certain entry level reflex camera of a slightly higher level). Of course, this tendency to small size is to be read as a clear effort to get closer to mirrorless cameras, keeping a reflex system.

According to Canon tradition, the ring and the buttons are quite friendly and easily reachable. Obviously, Canon EOS 2000D is an entry level camera, so don’t expect many direct drives.

Seen from above, the differences with 1300D are really few and you can notice, beside the flash and the on/off button:

The control ring including the “scene” mode.

The shoe mount for optional external flash.

A small wheel for the aperture or the exposure time.

Technical information

• The sensor of Canon EOS 2000D is 24 megapixels, with a decent ISO sensitivity (100-6400 expandable to H12,800), the processor is Digic 4.
• Shot mode: Single and Burst (also silent), Self-timer.
• ISO sensitivity: AUTO (100-6400), 100-6400 in 1 stop increment and extended range up to H:12,800. Video shooting: Auto (100-6400), 100-6400 (in complete stop increments).
• Optical viewfinder: 9 points automatic focus pentamirror. Coverage around 95% and 0.87x zoom.
• Flash: 9.2 incorporated GN
• Exposure compensation: +/- 5 EV, in 1/3 or 1/2 stop increment.
• Modes: Smart Auto, No flash, Automatic creative, Portrait, Landscape, Close-ups, Sport, Food, Night portrait, Video, AE Program, AE with shutter and aperture priority, Manual.
• The 3 inches LCD display is not touch screen and has a 920K dots resolution, the connectivity uses Wi-fi and NFC. There is also a 2.0 USB port and a micro HDMI output. The lithium battery lasts around 500 shots.

Canon EOS 2000D is clearly a product thought for those who decide to move to their first reflex camera and the proof is the presence of easy guidelines that can be very useful to learn the basic techniques with different shooting modes. In addition, there are several creative filters that will make the social network lovers very happy.

Image quality and shot

The qualitative standard is very similar to the EOS 1300D one: with a 24 megapixels APS-C sensor, definition is quite high, despite some difficulties in high ISO shots. Even though the sensor has the same size in both models, more megapixels inevitably lead to their smaller size. As a consequence, the light capture is limited for each pixel. (Wanna know more? Go to the article on ISO sensitivity)

Canon EOS 2000D offers jpeg and RAW formats. Of course, the second one keeps more data and is recommended to those who want to take on long post production sessions. Having said that, we’re dealing with a “take and shoot” camera, so the jpeg format seems to be the most obvious choice (but not the best quality one, it should be recalled).

Staying among the so-called entry level cameras, Canon EOS 2000D offers to the less experienced photographers the automatic shooting mode, with good performance like all the Canon models of that range. The experienced ones, instead, can try all the creative tools typical of reflex cameras: aperture and shutter priority and manual mode.

The above-mentioned “scene” modes are important for the beginners but they are seen as some sort of aberration by the purists. My opinion is definitely not that snob and unrealistic. How can you learn important notions like ISO, aperture and shutter if not with tools that, at the beginning, try to give you “packages” with those lessons? Of course, they’re not the best in terms of creativity, but the preset modes, for instance, are useful to give you an idea on how a shot can change, modifying the exposure time and/or the aperture. And that’s something.

Canon EOS 2000D Vs. similar reflex cameras

The fundamental comparisons are two: on the same home-ground with 1300D, on an away insidious game with Nikon D3400. Let’s see how Canon EOS 2000D plays out.

The main difference with 1300D is in the 24.1 megapixels Canon CMOS APS-C sensor: better image definition than with the 18 megapixels of the successful sister. Of course, this is not a revolution, but a detail not to be ignored, especially if you love printing your shots in formats larger than usual.

For the rest, in Canon EOS 2000D the 9 cross-centered points autofocus stays the same, as well as the 3 inches LCD display, Full HD 30p video support, Wi-Fi connectivity with NFC and 3 fps burst mode. The price, though, is very different: 340 € for 1300D versus around 450 € for Canon EOS 2000D (in both cases, camera body + 18-55 mm lens).

This is an unjustifiable difference, in my opinion, even if in the 2000D kit there is the IS stabilized 18-55mm lens, that makes the difference.

On the market since two years ago, at the moment Nikon D3400 costs around 480 euros with the standard lens (18-55). In this respect, it’s a tie with Canon EOS 2000D. Also the number of megapixels of the sensor is the same, 24.

The real differences between the two models are in the focus points: Nikon has two more (11 instead of 9). Also the number of frames per second is different, again better in Nikon: 5 instead of 3.

Talking about connectivity, Canon EOS 2000D is two years younger and we can feel it. While the Nikon model only has bluetooth (and wi-fi is optional), Canon has incorporated WiFi and NFC.

My opinion on 2000D

Good but not excellent, here is a summary of what I think about Canon EOS 2000D, the nth entry level camera that doesn’t bring anything new to the previous ones. The 24 megapixels sensor sounds more like a business move with the only aim of not having inferiority complex around the rival than an actual need.

Given the amazing dual pixel AF system on Canon APS-C (e.g. 77D, 800D, 200D), I would have liked best an upgrade of the autofocus, which has remained 9 points like 1300D instead. Besides, while 1300D has a more aggressive and affordable price, Canon EOS 2000D is still quite expensive for now.

Maybe the body+lens kit might decrease to 350 euros in a couple of months and then… the juice might be worth the squeeze. For now, unless you have particular needs (like incorporated wi-fi connection), Canon 1300D and Nikon D3400 are to be preferred over Canon EOS 2000D.