Olympus |
OM-D E-M1 Mark III |
---|---|
Announced: | 11 Feb 2020 |
Sensor Resolution: | 20Mp |
Sensor Type: | 4/3 CMOS |
ISO: | 200-25600 |
Weight: | 580g |
Physical Dimensions: | 134 x 91 x 69 mm |
Viewfinder: | Electronic |
Screen Type: | 3" Fully articulated |
Video Resolutions: | 4096x2160 |
Fujifilm |
GFX 50S II |
---|---|
Announced: | 02 Sep 2021 |
Sensor Resolution: | 51Mp |
Sensor Type: | Medium format CMOS |
ISO: | 100-12800 |
Weight: | 900g |
Physical Dimensions: | 150 x 104 x 87 mm |
Viewfinder: | Electronic |
Screen Type: | 3.2" Tilting |
Video Resolutions: | 1920x1080 |
![]() Portrait |
![]() |
Fujifilm GFX 50R |
85 | $3,937.98 |
![]() Landscape |
![]() |
Sony Alpha A7R IV |
71 | $4,796.00 |
![]() Sport |
![]() |
Nikon D6 |
80 | $5,149.99 |
![]() Street |
![]() |
Fujifilm X-Pro3 |
77 | $2,158.00 |
![]() Everyday |
![]() |
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VII |
77 | $1,204.95 |
Olympus |
OM-D E-M1 Mark III |
---|---|
Announced: | 11 Feb 2020 |
Sensor Resolution: | 20Mp |
Sensor Type: | 4/3 CMOS |
ISO: | 200-25600 |
Weight: | 580g |
Physical Dimensions: | 134 x 91 x 69 mm |
Viewfinder: | Electronic |
Screen Type: | 3" Fully articulated |
Video Resolutions: | 4096x2160 |
Review | compare Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III with | overall score | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
OlympusOM-D E-M1 Mark III | 64 | 47 | 46 | 70 | 71 | 74 | buy on |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
FujifilmGFX 100S | 78 | 93 | 94 | 72 | 67 | 67 | $6,159.00 |
![]() |
FujifilmGFX 100 | 76 | 93 | 94 | 75 | 62 | 63 | $8,298.00 |
![]() |
SonyAlpha A7c | 72 | 65 | 66 | 70 | 75 | 76 | $1,759.95 |
![]() |
FujifilmGFX 50S II | 72 | 85 | 87 | 63 | 62 | 62 | buy on |
![]() |
OlympusOM System OM-1 | 67 | 48 | 46 | 76 | 74 | 77 | buy on |
![]() |
FujifilmX-Pro3 | 65 | 53 | 50 | 63 | 77 | 78 | $2,158.00 |
Fujifilm |
GFX 50S II |
---|---|
Announced: | 02 Sep 2021 |
Sensor Resolution: | 51Mp |
Sensor Type: | Medium format CMOS |
ISO: | 100-12800 |
Weight: | 900g |
Physical Dimensions: | 150 x 104 x 87 mm |
Viewfinder: | Electronic |
Screen Type: | 3.2" Tilting |
Video Resolutions: | 1920x1080 |
Review | compare Fujifilm GFX 50S II with | overall score | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
FujifilmGFX 50S II | 72 | 85 | 87 | 63 | 62 | 62 | buy on |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
SonyAlpha A9 II | 73 | 67 | 67 | 75 | 74 | 76 | $4,094.95 |
![]() |
SonyAlpha A7R IV | 73 | 71 | 71 | 74 | 73 | 74 | $4,796.00 |
![]() |
SonyAlpha A7c | 72 | 65 | 66 | 70 | 75 | 76 | $1,759.95 |
![]() |
FujifilmGFX 50R | 70 | 85 | 86 | 58 | 62 | 63 | $3,937.98 |
![]() |
OlympusOM System OM-1 | 67 | 48 | 46 | 76 | 74 | 77 | buy on |
![]() |
FujifilmX-Pro3 | 65 | 53 | 50 | 63 | 77 | 78 | $2,158.00 |
In case you are wondering which of these cameras you should buy, then this is the right place to find an answer. Here you will find listed all the main differences among Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Fujifilm GFX 50S II, calculated by the CameraRace iCamRank algorithm.
But, as you may know, the technical performance is meaningless if applied to the wrong context. This is the reason why the iCamRank "weights" differently the camera technical features for each type of photography. Thus, below you'll find our suggestions, based on your preferred photography genre:
Fujifilm GFX 50S II is better for portrait or landscape photography; Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III is instead your choice if you shoot sport or street photography or for everyday use.
Need further details? Below you will find a full comparison of all the technical specifications.